What should be the approximate structure of the review of the book

Writing reviews on books can be an interesting activity for those who like to read and is able to logically express their thoughts on paper. After all, this is one way to share impressions about the book with like-minded paper writer, to present your perception of the plot and character of the characters.

 An approximate plan for reviewing the book: the introductory part; main idea; critical analysis; conclusions.

For many, the greatest difficulty is writing the beginning of the review. There are no clear rules, everyone chooses what is closer to him. Usually in the introduction, the tone of the review is set. Here are some options for how you can start a review: a brief description of the plot (a book on how …); genre disclosure; an intriguing quote from the book; personal evaluation (liked or disliked the book).

This part of the this should identify the main issues raised in the work, the range of problems and the main idea. Do not retell the main content of the book. The value of the review is given by the ability of the reviewer to assess competently how much the author was able to reveal the characters of the characters and to convey to the readers the main idea of the work, the peculiarities of its style and skill. Critical analysis First of all, attention should be paid to the title of the book, since it expresses the basic idea. Here you can give an estimate of how the time period and place of action are related to the theme of the book, and what mood is created when reading. It is interesting to consider the line of behavior of the main character: how his thoughts, feelings change, with what problems he encounters, his difference from the secondary heroes.

Conclusions. The reviewer assesses the relevance of the work, shares his personal impression of what he read, compares it with other works of the author.

Some criteria for assessing the work: the logic of the plot, the dynamics of the narrative, elaboration and reliability; feelings caused by heroes; author’s style and language; the uniqueness of the work; presence of blunders; relevance; their feelings.